V for Vendetta or J for Justice?

> Main Page | 7/7 | Elizabeth 2 Go | The Nazi Banksters' Crimes | Testimonials | Examples of How to Use the Defence

> More up-to-date news about the locking up of the author at:-

> http://mtrial.org/

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7PQG5weeHk

> Visit: Friends of Muad'Dib (mtrial.org)

> Alternative links if the above one isn't working:

> - Search for "7/7 Ripple Effect" on YouTube
> - A copy on Livevideo

> Downloads:

> ### 700 Mb DivX Avi

> Download using Bittorrent: [77 Ripple Effect.avi.torrent] (What is Bittorrent?)
> Direct Download: 7-7RippleEffect.avi (Right click and select "save file as" or similar to download)

> (You will need to have installed the DivX video codec to play this file)

> ### 2.6 Gb Pal DVD

> Direct download from the Internet Archive: 7-7_Ripple_Effect_DVD-PAL.iso

> Download using Bittorrent: 77 Ripple Effect.iso.torrent (What is Bittorrent?)

> ### 2.6 Gb NTSC DVD

> Download using Bittorrent: 77 Ripple Effect-NTSC.iso.torrent

> TRANSCRIPT
> version 0.5.3, last updated 04.11.07

> > 01 - MOCK EXERCISES AND BOMB HOAXES IN THE RUN-UP TO 7/7/2005.

> > 02 - PETER POWER: DUPE, OR ACCOMPLICE?

> > 03 - FOREIGN SECURITY FIRMS - CAN THEY BE TRUSTED?

> > 04 - THE FOUR MUSLIMS: ACTORS, OR PATSIES?

> > 05 - THE GHOST TRAINS.

> > 06 - THE NUMBER 30 BUS.

> > 07- PRE-PLANTED EXPLOSIVES.

> > 08 - CONCLUSION.

> > 09 - EPILOGUE.

> Dear Viewer,

> I hope this finds you well, in good spirit and having a good day.

> Regarding the 7/7/2005 terrorist attacks in London, let us look at the facts, and what we were told, and compare them. Then, using Ockham’s Razor and common-sense, let us see what conclusions are to be drawn, so we can all understand what most likely really did happen that day.

> First Chapter Title: “MOCK EXERCISES AND BOMB HOAXES IN THE RUN-UP TO 7/7/2005.”

> More than a year before the 7/7/2005 attacks, on the 16th of May 2004, an edition of the BBC ONE Panorama programme broadcasted a mock exercise, imagining what would happen if a terrorist-attack was executed in London, in the NEAR FUTURE, consisting of three explosions on tube-trains in the London Underground, and one explosion on a road vehicle.

> The following excerpt from the BBC transcript of the programme, gives us a good idea of why this programme was made…

> > “PRICE: If there are now bombs going off above ground, in this case a lorry being attacked, it could happen anywhere, so the potential for mass panic across not just the capital, but the whole country, is very much with us. I think therefore we need to look at more serious measures. We do have reserve powers in effect to take over the BBC if we were to wish to, and to get them to broadcast whatever we wanted them to broadcast. Those powers are there in the Broadcasting Act. My advice to the Prime Minister would be not to use those, but I think we should be talking to the broadcasters about having the Prime Minister on the air very quickly.

> > GILBERTSON: You wouldn't disagree with that Michael at all?

> > PORTILLO: No, I entirely agree that the Prime Minister should be out there, and we shouldn't be using the powers to bring in the BBC, but we should certainly be talking to the broadcasters, about the way in which the coverage is going to be organised.” (end quote)

> Please note well that he said, “the coverage is going to be ORGANISED.” In other words, he was saying that they would write the script for, then edit and control, the media coverage of an event in which there were three explosions on London tube-trains, and one on a road vehicle, if such an event were to take place in the near future. The question that begs to be asked is this: was that what they were actually in the process of planning, and precisely the reason for that programme?

> > Gavin Esler: This is the kind of terrorist attack the government repeatedly says is going to happen.

> > March 2004 David Blunkett, Home Secretary: "We've been absolutely clear we can't guarantee that there will never be an attack. It's quite likely that they're planning one now."

> > Michael Portillo says, “I am wondering about the purpose and effect of this very programme.”

> This BBC Panorama programme appears to have been used by those behind the 7/7/2005 attack, as the means by which the media's response to the attack in the near future was studied, so it could be controlled and directed towards their own ends. Mr. Price plays the “bad cop” and issues the threat of taking over control of the BBC, and then Mr. Portillo plays the “good cop” and says that there is no need to do that, as long as the BBC behaves itself, and broadcasts whatever they want them to. The “good cop”, “bad cop” scenario is just theatre, to deceive the viewer. The reality is that the BBC is a government propaganda machine and is already, and always has been, controlled and used by the government.

> > Tues May 25, 2004, 09:00
> > TUBE EXPLOSIONS
> > 3 blasts on London Underground
> > The headlines at 9 o'clock.
> > In the past hour there have been three major explosions on the London underground. The first occurred at 10 past 8 on the Piccadilly line between Knightsbridge and Hyde Park Corner. The second, at 16 minutes past 8, on the Central Line between Tottenham Court Road and Oxford Circus, and the third at 27 minutes past 8 as a train was arriving at Vauxhall Station from Stockwell on the Victoria line. Emergency services have been called to all three scenes. There are no reports available yet on the number of casualties, and the police have said that it's too early to identify a possible cause. London underground is now closed and the police are asking people not to travel.

> > Peter Power clip from Panorama from 6:45 to 7:00 minutes:
> > Our research indicates that something like 350,000 people alone are making their way towards the city of London at this point, and if the access overload system has been triggered and they can't get onto their mobile telephones, this will have profound indications for them, the next of kin...

> > Tues May 25, 2004, 10:41
> > LONDON ATTACKS
> > Chlorine tanker explodes
> > We can now confirm that a tanker carrying chlorine has exploded at the junction of Shoreditch High Street and Commercial Street. Chlorine is extremely toxic in this form and the police are issuing express warnings to people to stay indoors, close windows and remain there until the all clear is given. (end quote)

> In the days leading up to 7/7/2005 there were hoax bomb-scares in Nottingham and Sheffield.

> Were these false-alarm hoaxes meant not only to cause panic and confusion, but also to lull everyone into a false sense of security, and into thinking that the initial reports in London on 7/7/2005 would also be false-alarm hoaxes, so people would ignore them; until it was too late?

> | Link: Town bomb scare 'genuine mistake' Link: Bomb scare leads to city gridlock

> Second Chapter Title – “PETER POWER: DUPE, OR ACCOMPLICE?”

> Then, on 7/7/2005, we were told on TV, by Peter Power of Visor Consultants, that they, and the private company employing them, who helped choose the scenario for it, were running a mock terrorist drill, in the London Underground, with practically the same scenario as what actually really happened on that day. In other words, the actual mock anti-terror drill that the BBC Panorama programme of May 2004 had outlined, had been chosen, by Visor’s client, to be carried out on the VERY same day that four Muslim suicide-bombers, ALSO chose the same scenarios that Visor’s client had chosen for the mock drill, causing real and devastating explosions on three London tube-trains and one road vehicle. Please think about that unbelievable set of coincidences for a few seconds, to let the implications of it sink in. Then, please ask yourself: what are the odds against all of that happening by chance?

> In his TV video clip Peter Power states that their customer helped to choose the exact scenario. I repeat: Visor’s customer helped to choose the exact scenario. To this day Peter Power refuses to publicly identify the customer who chose the exact scenario. Why?

> Third Chapter Title: “FOREIGN SECURITY FIRMS - CAN THEY BE TRUSTED?”

> Verint Systems is the security firm that is responsible for the CCTV surveillance cameras, in the London Underground rail network, and it is an Israeli company, with approximately 1000 employees. No CCTV footage of the four Muslims boarding the tube-trains has been released by Verint; who claim that their cameras were not working. Why? Because the four Muslims were not on the tube-trains that blew up.

> Fourth Chapter Title: “THE FOUR MUSLIMS: ACTORS, OR PATSIES?”

> We were also told that the training exercise involved 1000 people, and, of course, amongst those 1000 people, would have to be the four people, who were recruited to play the parts of the mock terrorists.

> Therefore, as part of the exercise, they would have recruited four young Muslim men to carry four backpacks, that were to contain mock explosive devices.

> Who were their Muslim recruits?

> These Muslim men would naturally buy return train tickets, and not one-way tickets, because they would be going home after playing their parts in the training exercise.

> | Link: Why did they buy return train tickets to Luton?

> One of them, the oldest; who would be considered the ring-leader of the group, because of his age; would have been asked to make a “suicide video” prior to 7/7/2005, being told it would form part of the training mock-terrorist exercise; in order to make the exercise, and possibly a film to be made of it, look as realistic as possible. He would obviously not have been told the details of the whole plan, until later, probably when he and the others arrived in Luton on the 7th of July 2005, to make absolutely certain that the scenario of the drill which would take place that day, could not be talked about by, or to, anyone.

> The second oldest would also be asked to make a similar video, as a back-up, for just in case anything went wrong, and/or the oldest pulled out of the drill before the 7th of July 2005.

> It should be noted that neither Mohammed Sidique Khan, nor Shehzad Tanweer, specify what their targets were, in their videos. It is also interesting to note that no-one has ever claimed responsibility for the 7/7/2005 bombings, except for a message on a fake Al Quaeda website on the same day, that was traced to Texas in the USA.

> | Link: UK-based dissident denies link to website that carried al-Qaida claim

> Two years afterwards; because more and more people doubt the official story and are proving it to be lies and deception, and are rightfully demanding an independent investigation; the police have arrested, frightened, intimidated and harassed Mohammed Sidique Khan’s widow into publicly condemning her husband. She has a young daughter to protect, and has stated that she is now afraid of the police. They kept her in custody for 6 days, to intimidate her and then showed her what they claim is her husband’s Will and “suicide-note.” Obviously this was done to get her to condemn her husband publicly, in exchange for the authorities’ implied agreement to leave her alone, to which she will have agreed, in order to protect herself and her young daughter from further harassment. Where were these documents found, and why did it take two years for them to be shown to her? They are, after-all, her rightful property, if genuine. Two years is ample time to forge a short handwritten note, and signature on a Will.

> | Link: | J7 | The July Seventh Truth Campaign

> In view of the amount of time this “suicide-note” has taken to be mentioned, the timing of it, and all the lies and evidence the authorities have told, fabricated and planted, it cannot be trusted and must be considered another forgery, along with any other new so-called evidence that they might come up with.

> So, the scene is set for the training exercise to go ahead.

> The fake terrorists have been recruited, the suicide videos have been made, and everyone has been given basic instructions, for the day that the exercise is to be put into operation – 7/7/2005.

> The four mock-terrorist actors were to meet at Luton Train Station at 07:20 AM on the 7th of July 2005 and catch the 07:40 AM train from Luton to Kings’ Cross Thameslink Station, with their pretend-bomb backpacks, and then split up and catch three tube-trains and one bus, to pre-arranged destinations, where the fake explosions were to take place, as part of the training exercise.

> Finally the big day arrived.

> Everyone was ready. Everyone was either already where he was meant to be, or was heading there.

> But first let us take a step backwards for a moment, to look at the bigger picture, and put this mock-terror exercise into context with what was happening in Britain at that time.

> Tony Blair was in big trouble, because he had just been sent a very clear message from the British nation; via the May 2005 General Election, in which he was almost voted out of power; that the British people did not want British troops fighting in George Bush’s War of Terror in the Middle-East. So, to be able to keep the British troops fighting in the Middle-East, Tony Blair desperately needed something to happen, to change the nation’s mind.

> Gleneagles = Tony Blair; George Bush; G8 Meeting; Agenda of addressing World Poverty forced on them by Live Eight concerts around the world, but not for long. Their lucrative, evil, phoney and very unpopular War on Terror (which is really a War OF Terror) will promptly return to the top of the agenda, with four big bangs. No time for the poor, the rich have lots more money to make, and people to murder.

> Leeds = Where 3 of the Muslim actors lived and were recruited, and where the oldest, Mohammed Sidique Khan, was befriended by the local police, and was regularly called upon by them, to help them to sort out gang-rivalry problems. Mohammed was also taken on a tour of the House of Commons by a Leeds MP, who befriended him. The perfect patsy? Someone who was made to believe he could trust the authorities, and that they would therefore not deceive, or harm him? Someone who could, in turn, recruit 2 other Muslims for the drill, so they could all become famous and make a nice bit of clean and easy extra money, and show their patriotism by helping the authorities to protect Britain from terrorism?

> | Link: 7 July 2005 London bombings - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

> Aylesbury = A fourth Muslim actor who has been recruited, Germaine Lindsey from Aylesbury, will also meet them in Luton.

> Luton = Transport security firm ICTS, another Israeli company, has an office just a mile away from the Luton train station, which is suspected to be where the Muslim actors received their final instructions, before setting off for the train station - the details of which trains to board, which carriages to get into, where to sit, and which bus to catch, where to sit on it, and at what time.

> London = Commissioner of Police Ian Blair; Rudy Giuliani (Mayor of New York on 9/11); Benjamin Netanyahu (who said 9-11 was good for Israel); Peter Power; and all those taking part in the mock-terrorism drill, are present in Central London, in or around London Underground locations where the explosions take place, and also Tavistock Square.

> The four men were supposed to arrive together, on time, at Luton Station, and be caught on CCTV, at 07:21:54 AM, entering the station, but three of them are not on the same video frames as Hasib Hussain, so have to be inserted later, using computer software. Hence the obviously, and very badly, doctored official single frame, time-stamped photo that we have been shown, from the CCTV outside Luton Station.

> They can’t show them moving, because it has been faked, that’s why they show only one single frame still photo.

> Why did the authorities have to fake this photo? They would have had to fake it, because three of the actors missed the tube-trains that they were supposed to catch, and which blew up without them being onboard, and so there was no video footage from Verint Systems of them boarding the three tube-trains, for the authorities to be able to use, as false evidence, to try to prove to the public that the Muslims were guilty. So they had to doctor and show us the fake photo instead.

> Remember what Michael Portillo said on the May 2004 BBC Panorama programme: “the coverage is going to be ORGANISED.”

> So far, they are apparently running according to the training exercise plan, and on schedule.

> Fifth Chapter Title: “THE GHOST TRAINS.”

> Unfortunately for the people who have organised the event, the train that the four Muslim actors are supposed to catch, the 07:40 AM train to Kings’ Cross Thameslink, has been cancelled and the next one too, so they cannot possibly make it in time to catch the tube-trains, that they were supposed to catch, as part of the training exercise.

> The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry, as the Hand of God interferes.

> In spite of official confirmation that the 07:40 AM train was cancelled, and the next one too, the Home Office report still contains the lie that the non-existent 07:40 AM train was the one that the four Muslims caught. The authorities have to keep lying about it, in order to continue to try to make the public believe, that three of the four Muslim men, who boarded a train from Luton to King’s Cross, arrived in time to catch the three tube-trains that blew up. In so doing, the authorities make it perfectly clear, that the truth of what happened that day is of no importance to them. It is obvious from their actions that the only thing that is important to the authorities, is to make us believe what they had already planned to make us believe, even when the facts prove it to be a lie.

> | Link: Facts About the Train Times on July 7th

> The first available train the Muslim actors can catch, gets them to King’s Cross after the tube trains have already left without them. Hasib Hussain splits off from the other three at King’s Cross Thameslink station, because he still has time to catch the number 30 bus, as his part in the mock-terror exercise. When the tube-trains they were supposed to catch are blown up, the other three smell a rat and realise they have been duped, and are Muslim patsies who will be blamed for the attacks, and everyone knows what happened to Lee Harvey Oswald.

> The Muslims are not from London. Their homes are many miles away, and so they are like fish out of water, and have no idea what to do, or where to go and hide. They realise that they can’t go home, and do not know anyone in London whom they can trust.

> The phones are all not working, first of all because they were jammed, and then shut down by the authorities, so they cannot phone anyone to tell them what has happened. What can they do to prevent themselves from being wrongly blamed for the explosions? What would you do in that situation?

> On one of the early TV news broadcasts that day, a newsreader announced that a report has come in, that three of the terrorists involved in the bombings have been shot and killed, by the anti-terrorist branch of the police, at Canary Wharf, in the Docklands area of London’s East-end. The announcement was made only once, and never repeated, for obvious reasons. How could suicide-bombers possibly have survived the tube-train bombings, and then been in the Docklands to be shot? In a New Zealand Herald newspaper article it says that two people were shot dead outside the HSBC building, and in Canada's Globe and Mail newspaper only one.

> | Link: 'Police shot bombers' reports New Zealander

> There is another newspaper report, that the police shot a suicide bomber outside the Credit Suisse First Boston Bank, which is approximately 1,400 feet, or 467 yards, away from the HSBC building, measured door to door. The two buildings are very different in both shape and size, and 467 yards apart, and thus they are not easily confused with each other.

> | Link: POLICE were yesterday probing reports a man had been "neutralised" outside Canary Wharf. It is believed the man was shot dead by police marksmen outside the Credit Suisse First Boston bank. South London Press.

> That means that the police shot and killed at least three suicide-bombers in Canary Wharf, on 7/7/2005. How could suicide-bombers, who were supposed to have blown themselves up on the three tube-trains, have survived and been shot-dead at Canary Wharf?

> If we have at least three of the four "suicide-bombers" shot dead at Canary Wharf, and we KNOW they weren't on the tube-trains that blew up, because the 07:40 AM train from Luton to King's Cross was cancelled that day, then we have overwhelming proof that they did not blow the tube-trains up, and that the blowing up of the three tube-trains was an inside-job.

> At the Canary Wharf Docklands site there are media companies, for the Muslim patsies to have told their story to and cleared their names, if they could, and two possible escape routes, via air from the nearby London City Airport, that has flights to 34 destinations in the U.K. and Europe, and, if they couldn’t fly out, there was the possibility of getting a boat across the channel to France.

> Sixth Chapter Title: “THE NUMBER 30 BUS.”

> The fourth Muslim backpacker, Hasib Hussain, who has been blamed for the number 30 bus-bombing, is reported to have been seen wandering around London, going into McDonalds, and eating a beef-burger. He is reported to have tried unsuccessfully to contact the other three by phone, on Euston Road outside King’s Cross at 08.55 AM, but the phones were not working, because they were first of all jammed, and then shut down by the authorities.

> What happened to him?

> He was the youngest of the four, only eighteen years old, and described, by those who knew him, as a gentle giant. Therefore he was possibly the least worldly-wise, and he was also on his own, in a strange city, and a long way from home. He might not have realized he was in danger of being framed as a patsy, believed all the chaos around that part of London was just part of the mock-terrorism exercise that he was part of, and so just continued with his assigned role, which was to board a certain double-decker bus, at an appointed time, and sit at the back of the top deck. A double-decker, upon which a large advertisement for a play had been placed on one side, reading: “Outright Terror, Bold And Brilliant.”

> Please think about that sign on the side of the bus, and the sick minds of the people who planned the attacks.

> Now this is where it gets weird, because we are told that Hasib Hussain started from King’s Cross Thameslink station, and was seen on a number 91 bus travelling West along Euston Road to Euston Station, where he caught the number 30 bus, that would have then travelled East, back along Euston Road retracing his steps, back to where he started from at King’s Cross, if it had not been diverted into Tavistock Square. Why would someone carrying a large, heavy backpack do that, unless he was following a script, written by someone who knew, in advance, that that particular number 30 bus, registration LX03BUF, would be diverted into Tavistock Square, and that Hasib Hussain would therefore not be able to get on it at King’s Cross Thameslink, which is where he had arrived at, on the train from Luton? Only someone who is a stranger to London would do that without asking why, because it is a totally illogical thing to do, for someone who knows London, and knows that the number 30 bus goes past King’s Cross Thameslink station, so that they could have caught it there, instead. It would be a complete waste, of time, energy, money, and an unnecessary risk to take, and thus a totally illogical thing for a real terrorist to do.

> | Link: London Buses route 30

> It now gets unbelievably weird, because the number 91 bus, that Hasib Hussain is reported to have taken from King’s Cross, along Euston Road to Euston Station; to board the number 30 bus, registration LX03BUF, that got diverted into Tavistock Square; actually goes to Tavistock Square. So, if he wanted to get to Tavistock Square, he could just have stayed on the number 91 bus, and been sure of getting directly to Tavistock Square. The number 91 bus route goes from King’s Cross to Tavistock Square.

> | Link: London Buses route 91

> That is conclusive proof that that particular number 30 bus, registration LX03BUF, was part of Peter Power and his customer’s mock-terrorist drill, pre-rigged with explosives, like the three tube-trains, and was pre-planned to be diverted into, and blown up in, Tavistock Square, rather than blown up by a backpack bomb. Whoever planned this, obviously planned to kill Hasib Hussain with that bus explosion, so he could not tell anyone what had happened, just as they had planned to kill the other three Muslim actors with the explosions on the three tube-trains.

> At 09.00 AM a number 30 bus, registration LX03BUF, left Marble Arch on its return journey to Hackney Wick. It arrived at Euston Bus Station at 09.35 AM, but was then diverted from its normal route, into Tavistock Square, and stopped outside the medical offices of the BMA, where it was blown up, at 09.47 AM, as part of the terrorist exercise gone live. This also fits with the BBC Panorama mock-terrorist programme of May 2004, where the explosion of a road vehicle was scheduled to take place AFTER the three tube-train explosions.

> A white van from a demolition company called Kingstar is seen and photographed parked at the side of the bus, immediately after the explosion, and a mysterious “witness”, Richard Jones, gives an account of what he says happened to the bus, on camera; which is something that normally would not be allowed by the police, unless it was part of a filmed training-exercise. Then, after a spate of very contradictory TV and newspaper interviews, within a very short space of time; that make sure everyone now believes the explosion was caused by a suicide-bomber on the bus; Richard Jones disappears from view.

> However, and of particular interest, some newspapers, including the U.K.’s Sunday Mail on the 10th July 2005, reported that Richard Jones served an apprenticeship at an explosives factory, in Ayrshire. Richard Jones’ statements, about the suicide-bomber, are very suspicious, for two reasons: first, because they are so inconsistent and contradictory that they are not believable; and second, because criminals usually accuse someone else, to divert attention away from themselves. Is that what Richard Jones did? He says that he and eleven other people got off the bus, just before it exploded. Were the twelve of them a team, with the other eleven there to cover up what Richard Jones was doing, as he planted a bomb? Another strange statement he made, to The Sun Newspaper, reported in the 8th July 2005 edition, is that he got off the bus, because he had reached his destination. How could he possibly have reached his destination, on a bus that had been diverted from its normal route, unless he was part of the mock-terrorism exercise team, and got off the bus, as planned, in Tavistock Square, after planting a bomb, just before it was detonated? Does he work for Kingstar? Kingstar, whose white van was parked next to the bus, is a company that specializes in controlled demolitions, and Richard Jones said he served an apprenticeship at an explosives factory in Ayrshire. Was the Kingstar van there as part of Peter Power and his customer’s training mock-terrorism drill, to supervise the mock-explosion that became real?

> So, if Hasib Hussain was supposed to have been on that number 30 bus, registration LX03BUF, how would it be possible for him to get the exact bus, that would get him to one of the four locations where the mock-terrorist exercise would be taking place, when that bus was diverted from its normal route, to Tavistock Square, unless he had been recruited to play the part of a mock-terrorist and told exactly which bus to get, where and at what time, by the people who organised the mock-terrorism exercise, and who knew the bus would be diverted to Tavistock Square? The odds against that happening by coincidence are unbelievable, and thus it is not possible that it was a coincidence.

> Another unbelievable coincidence is that all of the CCTV cameras, at all four of the blast sites, were not working that day.
> The four CCTV cameras on the number 30 bus were; just like the Israeli Verint Systems’ ones on the underground; not working, and there are no reliable witnesses who can place Hasib Hussain on the number 30 bus. Richard Jones is an unreliable witness, whose physical description, of the man he says was the suicide-bomber, does not fit with Hasib Hussain’s appearance, or what he was wearing that day. So there is no proof that Hasib Hussain was either on that bus, or blew it up. Even so, he has been tried and wrongfully found guilty of blowing up the number 30 bus, by the government organized and controlled media machine, without a shred of real evidence.

> | Link: London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious Link: CCTV cameras on the bus were not working .

> They claim to have found Hasib Hussain’s ID in Tavistock Square. However, they also claim that ID from another of the four, Mohammed Sidique Khan, was found in at least two, some reports say three, separate blast locations. He cannot possibly have been in two or all three locations at the same time, proving that these items were planted after the blasts. How could their IDs have survived suicide bomb-blasts? Millions of people are aware of the magic fireproof Mohammed Atta passport, that was planted at the WTC on 9-11. In light of these incidents, if ID from Hasib Hussain was found at Tavistock Square, it does not necessarily mean that he was on the bus, and not somewhere else, or, if he was on the bus, that he blew the bus up.

> What has happened to the presumption of innocence; and being considered innocent until proven guilty and convicted by a jury of your peers, in court; that has always been the mainstay of British justice?

> The most likely case is that the number 30 bus had been pre-rigged with explosives during its previous service, when the CCTV cameras were disabled. The CCTV systems on Stagecoach buses are normally either the Israeli company Verint Systems RP12001, or Timespace X.200.

> A witness, Richmal Marie Oates-Whitehead, aged 35, who worked at the BMA in Tavistock Square, and was hailed as a heroine for her actions during the London bombings, said she heard two explosions on the bus. The controlled media immediately went on the offensive, and did a character assassination of the heroine, because her testimony did not fit with the official story, and she died unexpectedly, shortly afterwards. However, other witnesses also reported a second explosion on the bus. Richmal’s and other witness’ testimonies would account for pre-planted explosives, and a bomb being planted later, on 7/7/2005.

> What we can be certain about though, is that, either on the bus, or elsewhere, Hasib Hussain; like the other three Muslim patsies; was murdered.

> Seventh Chapter Title: “PRE-PLANTED EXPLOSIVES.”

> Witnesses of the tube-train explosions state that there were no Muslims with backpacks, and no backpacks, or bags, left unattended on the trains, in the carriages that blew up, and that the floors of the trains blew upwards from underneath, not downwards, as would be the case with explosives inside the trains.

> Explosives underneath the train floors; powerful enough to rupture the carriage floors and bend them upwards; would also lift the carriages up off the rails and derail them, as did happen. Those explosives were not home-made, but military-grade high-explosives, that would not be available to Muslim suicide-bombers. The official story was that they used home-made explosives, which has later been proven to be a lie.

> So we know, from reliable eye-witnesses, who can be traced, that there were no backpack home-made bombs or Muslim bombers inside the tube-train carriages that blew up, and that the floors blew upwards, so the bombs, which were made from military high-grade explosives, must have been fastened underneath the floors of the train carriages. Only people having access to the tube-trains, during the times that the trains were not running, would be able to plant those bombs, under the train floors.

> Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Finance Minister, said that he was warned by Scotland Yard; not to leave his hotel-room, on the morning of 7/7/2005, before the first explosion was reported; implying that they had foreknowledge of the plan. Scotland Yard then quickly denied being the ones who provided the warning, but have not told us who did warn Netanyahu, if they did not. Why was Benjamin Netanyahu warned, but not the British people who pay their wages, and whom they are paid to protect? Was it because it would have spoiled their evil plan, to murder British people, to change the nation’s mind, about British troops fighting in the Middle-East?

> Two weeks later the head of the Israeli Mossad, General Meir Dagan, said that he had warned Benjamin Netanyahu at 08.40 AM, on 7/7/2005, ten minutes before the first blast occurred. How did he know what was going to happen in London, if Scotland Yard did not warn him? Did he wait, to warn Benjamin Netanyahu, until it was too late to warn the British people, so as not to spoil their evil plan? Was the London bombing a covert MI5 operation, or an Israeli Mossad operation, or a joint operation by both of them? The British people have the right to know.

> Tony Blair said on the day of the explosions, that, “We KNOW this was done in the name of Islam”, when there was no proof whatsoever of who had done it, therefore indicating he possibly had foreknowledge of the plan and who they intended to blame, and the reason why they were going to blame the Muslims.

> As proof that this was a slip-up, and needed covering up, look at how the BBC later falsely reported his actual words, giving further proof that the BBC is a government propaganda machine and the coverage was “organised”, exactly as Michael Portillo said it would be, in the BBC Panorama programme in May 2004.

> > "In addition I welcome the statement that has been put out by the Muslim Council of Great Britain. We know that these people act in the name of Islam..."
> > Statement from the PM following COBR meeting

> > "In addition, I welcome the statement put out by the Muslim Council who know that those people acted in the name of Islam..."
> > BBC: In full: Blair on bomb blasts

> Later that same day, Efraim Halevi, a former head of the Israeli Mossad, wrote in an article published on the Jerusalem Post website, at 18:10 PM (London time), that the attacks had been carried out simultaneously with "near-perfect" execution. How did he know they had only been “near-perfect”? How could he have known what the "perfect" results should have been, in order to know that the actual results were not perfect, unless he was in on the plot? How many more people had they intended to murder, in order for it to be considered "perfect" execution? How did he know, at least two days before the London authorities released the information on the 9th of July, that the bombs were detonated simultaneously, unless he was in on the plot? As proof that this too was a slip-up, the Jerusalem Post article in question was completely removed from their website, after people began to ask similar questions.

> | Link: Ex-Mossad Chief Calls For World War After London Attack

> The following day Police Commissioner Ian Blair also made a slip-up, on camera, and said that there were four miserable bombers, and then very quickly corrected himself, showing that he too possibly had foreknowledge of the plan to use four Muslims as patsies.

> We are told that the first reports were of an electrical power-surge that occurred, and then later we were told that there were bombs that exploded on the tube-trains, and that it was an Al Quaeda terrorist attack, with Muslim suicide-bombers carrying backpack home-made explosive-devices onto the tube-trains.

> A couple of weeks later, a Brazilian contract electrician is brutally and publicly murdered, on a tube-train, and again we are told lies by the police and media, about him.

> He was a contract electrician. For whom had he been working, and what had he been working on, in the days leading up to the 7th of July 2005? Remember that the first reports from the media about 7/7/2005 were of an electrical power-surge, and Jean Charles de Menezes was a contract electrician.

> Was he hired, as part of the terrorist exercise’s 1000 people, to wire up devices for mock-explosions, to be set off by a power-surge? Did he see the explosive-devices being fastened under the tube-train carriage floors, and later realise what had really happened, and was starting to talk about it?

> Did THEY (The Hierarchy Enslaving You) publicly execute him, to shut him up, and as a warning to others to keep their mouths shut?

> We have been unable to find out where he worked. We know about his cousins who live in London, and his family coming over from Brazil, but we do not know where he worked.

> Why?

> Who is the person calling himself Richard Jones, and claiming to have been next to the suicide-bomber on the bus, and a witness to the bus-bombing, and why did he tell so many lies? Why did Peter Power smirk, grin and giggle, when he spoke about the “coincidence”, that the exercise had turned out to be real, when lots of people had been killed and injured?

> What is funny about that?

> The probability of the 7/7/2005 Drill and Attack Coinciding, without being planned to coincide, in a 10 year period is: ONE chance in 3,715,592,613,265,750,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

> Infowars.com | July 13, 2005 Comment: This is absolutely mind-boggling. The chances for these two events taking place at the same time, let alone in the same locations, are astronomical (numbers so big we had to look up how to say them). And these estimates are within a very conservative five year mean. In other words, most statistical analysis that is designed to create the impression of a similarly incredible improbability is usually framed within a greater amount of time: 50 years since England began experiencing bombings, 130 years since the Tube first opened, etc. We don't need to frame these results in that way, because the chance is so low, that these events would ever occur simultaneously, without some sort of intervention, that one might go so far as to call it impossible. Probability of 7/7 Drill and Attack Coinciding London Underground Stations: 274 RELATED: Explosions In London Probability of one attack by hour (5yr mean): One chance in 9,474,920 Open Hours per Day: 19 Probability of 3 station terror hit (5yr mean): One chance in 850,602,500,906,920,000,000 Open Days a Year: 364 Mean Sample frequent (yrs): 5. Probability of one attack by hour (10yr mean): One chance in 18,949,840 Mean Sample frequent (yrs): 10. Probability of 3 station terror hit (10yr mean): One chance in 6,804,820,007,255,360,000,000 Same Time 3 London Underground Stations: 274 Probability of drill on 1 stations per hour: One chance in 817,342 Open Hours per Day: 19 Probability of drill on 3 stations per hour: One chance in 546,023,643,432,766,000 Open Days a Year: 157 Same Time 3 PROBABILITY OF DRILL AND TERROR ATTACK COINCIDING BY CHANCE (10yr mean): One chance in 3,715,592,613,265,750,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Estimate of Grains of sand in the whole world: 7,500,000,000,000,000,000 ( HYPERLINK "http://www.miamisci.org/tripod/whysand.html" http://www.miamisci.org/tripod/whysand.html) In context: If I go to a beach, or a desert, or under the sea and pick a single grain of sand. What chance is there of you going to the same part of the world, by chance, and picking up the same grain? You are trillions of times more likely to do this, than the London drill coinciding with this attack at that hour. I wonder why the media aren't investigating the drill?? | Link: Probability of 7/7 Drill and Attack Coinciding

> Why are Peter Power, Verint Systems, Richard Jones, Commissioner Ian Blair, the anti-terrorist branch who shot and murdered these innocent people, the Israeli Mossad, Tony Blair and the government itself not under investigation for these horrendous crimes?

> Eighth Chapter Title: “CONCLUSION.”

> The times of the trains and tube-trains, on that day, have been carefully checked. The first train after 07:40 AM left Luton at 07:56 AM, and arrived at King’s Cross Thameslink Station at 08:42 AM. The three tube trains that blew up left Kings’ Cross underground station at:-

> 08:35 AM - the Eastbound Circle line train (204);

> 08:42 AM - the Westbound Circle line train (216);

> 08:48 AM - the Piccadilly Line train south.

> It was therefore impossible for any of the four accused Muslims to have caught the tube trains that blew up.

> If we have at least three of the four "suicide bombers" being shot-dead at Canary Wharf, and we KNOW they weren't on the tube-trains, because the 07:40 AM train from Luton to King's Cross was cancelled that day, and the photo of them outside Luton Station at 07:21:54 AM is a fake, and that Hasib Hussain was part of the mock-terrorism exercise, then we have overwhelming proof that the four accused Muslims were patsies, and are innocent, and that it was an inside-job, and that, like Lee Harvey Oswald, they too have been murdered, to silence them.

> Whether the bombings were done by MI5, the Israeli Mossad, or both of them, and/or others has yet to be determined, but the one thing we can be sure of, is that it was NOT done by four young Muslims.

> Ninth Chapter Title: “EPILOGUE.”

> Hopefully, amongst the security-services, there must be at least some decent, honest people who know that the official story is a pack of lies, and are troubled by it. Unfortunately they are all keeping quiet about it. We need them to have the courage to come forward, and say what they know, and arrest their evil colleagues, and bring them to justice, if they don't want to be also condemned as accomplices of the government and media criminals who committed treason, and mass-murder that day, and helped to cover it up, enabling the Orwellian Big Brother Police State plans for Britain to pick up steam, and the real perpetrators, the New World Order government-terrorists, to plunge the world into World War 3, and Armageddon.

> Why do you think THEY have made a Big Brother TV programme, to programme people’s minds and get them used to the idea of living under constant surveillance, and to like it, and volunteer to take part in it?

> Why do you think they are called PROGRAMMES?

> It is because they are used for mind-control, brainwashing, programming of the public’s minds, into obeying, and sleep-walking, whilst following their New World Order hidden agenda.

> The sleeper must awaken. The sleeper must awaken.

> The television is the greatest mind-control and propaganda weapon ever invented.

> Do you think you should be paying for a TV license to fund all THEIR programming of YOUR mind and the lies and propaganda they are broadcasting to deceive, brainwash, control and enslave everyone, including you? Does the TV, and watching it, not already control most of your life and the way you think?

> Do you think you should be paying for all those CCTV cameras and their operatives to spy on you, everywhere you go, so they can enslave you, and fine you, thereby stealing your money, for doing nothing wrong? Especially when they use your own money from those fines and taxes to pay for even more CCTV cameras, so you have even less privacy and freedom, and then they claim that the cameras do not work, when there is a real crime being committed, by the people who control the cameras?

> Don’t you realize that, in paying fines and taxes, you are actually paying for the chains they are using to enslave you with? Wake up, look and see the reality, that you are actually paying for them to turn you into their slave.

> The government is continually and illegally passing new legislation, to restrict your freedom and obtain more and more information about you, to control you, and yet, they themselves are becoming more and more secretive, and out of control. They have turned the relationship between the people and government, into the opposite of what it should be. It should be, public servants serving the people, not the people serving public government masters, or, more accurately, dictators.

> Please, for your own sakes, make copies of this film for everyone you know, and for the media outlets in your area, to wake them up and let everyone know the truth, so that the public will give the decent, honest people in the security-services their support, and encouragement, to tell the truth, and arrest their evil colleagues.

> Long live the Fighters,

> Muad’Dib.

> http://JforJustice.co.uk

> Link: Commentary about the recent MI5 revelations in The Independent about the modus operandi of MI and the U.K. police (May 2009).